Legal Opinion

Havelock Bank of Lincoln v. McArthur

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1985No. 84-468PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

The instant appeal presents to this court the question of whether a notice sent by a secured creditor to a debtor was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Neb. U.C.C. § 9-504(3) (Reissue 1980) and thereby entitle the creditor to obtain a deficiency judgment against the debtor. The district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, held that the notice was sufficient and entered a deficiency judgment for the Havelock Bank of Lincoln (Havelock) and against the appellants, Frank T. McArthur and Marilyn J. McArthur (McArthurs). We believe that the notice was not sufficient, and for that reason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DeLay First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Jacobson Appliance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bank of Gering v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Citizens State Bank v. SparksNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. FIRST NAT. BANK AND TRUST CO. v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. HermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mason State Bank v. SekuteraNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. HaumontNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Andre Noel SportsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. Garden National Bank v. CadaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  5. Matter of GerberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API