Legal Opinion
Nissim v. McNeil Consumer Products Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1997No. Civil Action 95-3211PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, on this 17th day of March, 1997, upon consideration of the motion of plaintiff Benjamin Nissim (“plaintiff”) for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs (Document No. 77), 1 and response of defendant McNeil Consumer Products Company, Inc. (“defendant”) thereto, and having made the following facts and conclusions of law:
1. Plaintiff sought damages 2 from defendant for alleged discrimination in employment on account of race, religion, or national origin and for retaliatory discharge under Title VII. The case of plaintiff was tried before a jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Venen v. SweetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tunison v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Stefanoni v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of BurlingtonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STILLWELLDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022