Legal Opinion
Felice Lazae Martin and Hector Joseph Borges v. Michael Castillo, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 18, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01123Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FELICE LAZAE MARTIN and HECTOR Case No. 1:25-cv-01123-KES-CDB JOSEPH BORGES, 11 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS Plaintiffs, FOR RECONSIDERATION 12 Docs. 34, 45, 52 13 v. 14 15 MICHAEL CASTILLO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On July 15, 2026, plaintiffs Felice Lazae Martin and Hector Joseph Borges filed a motion 18 for reconsideration of the court’s June 26, 2026, order (Doc. 33). Doc. 34. In support of that 19 motion for reconsideration, plaintiffs filed a joint declaration, Doc. 35, a supplemental declaration 20…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Powershare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Alvin Lou Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.