Southern Pacific Company v. Dickerson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
Plaintiffs (appellants herein) filed their complaint in the court below seeking declaratory relief in a judgment declaring (1) that NRS 705.390, properly construed, does not require the employment of “firemen” on appellants’ diesel freight locomotives; (2) that if construed to require such employment, it would violate the due process clause (Art. 1, § 8) of the Nevada Constitution.
This appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint. The trial judge was of the opinion that NRS 705.390 requires the employment of a fireman on appellants’ diesel freight…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Railroad Commission v. Texas & New Orleans R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- County of Clark v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Western Pacific Railroad v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1952
- Bressler v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. BryanNevada Supreme Court · 1986