Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Company v. Dickerson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1964No. 4803PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Plaintiffs (appellants herein) filed their complaint in the court below seeking declaratory relief in a judgment declaring (1) that NRS 705.390, properly construed, does not require the employment of “firemen” on appellants’ diesel freight locomotives; (2) that if construed to require such employment, it would violate the due process clause (Art. 1, § 8) of the Nevada Constitution.

This appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint. The trial judge was of the opinion that NRS 705.390 requires the employment of a fireman on appellants’ diesel freight…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Railroad Commission v. Texas & New Orleans R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. County of Clark v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Western Pacific Railroad v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Bressler v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doe v. BryanNevada Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API