Legal Opinion
Pipelines, Inc. v. Muhlenberg County Water District
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 2, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Judge.
Several suppliers of materials filed suits to enforce materialman’s liens. Among the defendants were Muhlenberg County Water District (hereinafter District 1), Muhlenberg County Water District No. *9293 (hereinafter District 3) and Pipelines, Inc. and Frank Vogler, a joint venture, (hereinafter Pipelines). Pipelines had contracted to construct two water systems for District 1 and one water system for District 3. The suppliers’ claims were satisfied leaving only the controversies presented by the cross claims between the water districts and Pipelines.
The jury awarded Pipelines…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Farrington Motors, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Harrod v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ellison v. R & B CONTRACTING, INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Burgess v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Beaver v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Ellison v. R & B CONTRACTING, INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000