Legal Opinion

REED v. LONG

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided October 29, 2019No. 5:19-cv-00385Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION CHRISTOPHER REED, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-385 (MTT) ) ) GARY LONG, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER The Plaintiffs are sex offenders. That is because many years ago they committed offenses that fall within the State of Georgia’s definition of sex offenses. Since then, they have served their terms of imprisonment and have, as far as the law is concerned, paid their debts to society. But because they have been classified as sex offenders, they remain subject to Georgia’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API