Legal Opinion

Ramsdell v. Ramsdell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Wiest, J. Bill by Newton Ramsdell against John Ramsdell and others to set aside a deed. From a decree for complainant, defendant John Ramsdell appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to set aside a deed made by Ransler Ramsdell on the 22d day of September, 1897, to his son John Ramsdell, the defendant, upon the grounds of undue influence and incompetency by reason of his insanity. The defendant answered, denying that the deed was executed by reason of undue influence, and denying that the grantor, at the time of executing it, was of unsound mind. Upon these two questions issue was joined, and the cause heard upon proofs taken in open court. A decree was made setting aside the deed on the ground that, at the time of executing it, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. O'Connor v. MadisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hemphill v. HolfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Davis v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lewis v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Lembrich's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Irwin v. LattinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Demerse v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Griffith v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API