Legal Opinion
Poindexter v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 26, 1996No. Civil Action 94-2341-GTVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court upon motion for summary judgment by defendant Atchi- son, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe) (Doc. 17). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
I.Background
Santa Fe hired plaintiff Linda L. Poindex-ter to work as a clerk at its Kansas City, Kansas office in June 1974. The plaintiff is a member of the Transportation Communication Union (union), which, under a previous name, entered into an “Implementing Agreement” with Santa Fe. Pursuant to this agreement, Poindexter maintains she was offered two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Poindexter v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997