Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1976No. 75-580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The city of Cleveland argues that the city’s actual needs are reflected by clear evidence, in 115 pages of the transcript before the Board of Tax Appeals. That evidence, the city contends, compels increased expenditures to meet rising crime rates, a 21.9 percent increase in crime in 1974 over 1973, and an estimated 40 to 50 percent increase in 1975 over 1973.

Additionally, appellant asserts that 1974 police expenditures were financed in part by federal revenue sharing funds, federal test grants, and revenues from the sale of a capital asset of the city, which revenues are not recurring; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Brooklyn v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Cuyahoga County v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Russell Township v. Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cleveland Public Library v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City Commission of City of Springfield v. Bethel TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Cleveland v. Budget Commission of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Russell Township v. Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API