Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Peelle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The complaint of the appellee is based upon a deed containing the usual covenants of warranty. The breach alleged is, that, at the time the deed was executed, the grantor did not have title to, or right to convey, a part of the land therein described j that a judgment was duly entered in *385an action instituted by the claimants thereof, adjudging them to be the owners, and that the appellee’s intestate thereupon surrendered possession of the land awarded by the judgment to the claimants.

It is urged that the administrator has no right to maintain this action, and we are referred to the cases of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Coleman v. LymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Rhode v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Craig v. DonovanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. McClure v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Wright v. TichenorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Boyce v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API