State v. Conger
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Appellant Conger was charged, in separate informations, with two counts of third-degree forgery and with being a habitual offender. An agreement was apparently reached whereby, if the appellant would plead guilty to the two charges of third-degree forgery, the state would move to have the habitual offender information dismissed.
At arraignment, the appellant pleaded guilty to both charges of third-degree forgery. The court accepted his pleas of guilty to both charges and asked the appellant if he would like to request a presentence investigation. The appellant declined. Prior…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- The People v. AdkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GroshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. ArabieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BraunSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GarreauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.