Legal Opinion

State v. Conger

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1978No. 12191PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Appellant Conger was charged, in separate informations, with two counts of third-degree forgery and with being a habitual offender. An agreement was apparently reached whereby, if the appellant would plead guilty to the two charges of third-degree forgery, the state would move to have the habitual offender information dismissed.

At arraignment, the appellant pleaded guilty to both charges of third-degree forgery. The court accepted his pleas of guilty to both charges and asked the appellant if he would like to request a presentence investigation. The appellant declined. Prior…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. The People v. AdkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GroshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. State v. ArabieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. BraunSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. GarreauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API