Legal Opinion
State v. Grosh
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1986No. 14830PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
Stephen G. Grosh (Mr. Grosh) appeals from a Judgment of Conviction entered upon a plea of guilty to a charge of distribution of cocaine. SDCL 22-42-2 and SDCL 34-20B-16. We affirm.
FACTS
In October 1983, Mr. Grosh was charged with distribution of cocaine and marijuana. At the same time, Linda D. Grosh (Linda), Mr. Grosh’s wife, was also charged with distribution of cocaine. Events leading to the respective charges occurred on different dates. The Groshs retained Attorney Catherine G. Ortner and Attorney Ortner detected no conflict of interest in the dual representation.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. SchulzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Two Eagle v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.