Legal Opinion

City of Arkansas City v. Bruton

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 7, 2006No. 94,893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Ronald D. and Rebecca A. Bruton (Brutons) appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Arkansas City in this complex litigation regarding tire scope of an easement and involving claims and counterclaims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, together with inverse condemnation damages, as a result of the City’s improvements of a dike being *44maintained across the Brutons’ property. Concluding that the easement should be construed more narrowly than did tire district court and that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment, we reverse and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Aladdin Petroleum Corporation v. Gold Crown PropertiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Potter v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Schneider v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of PalmerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API