Legal Opinion

Oregon Saw Chain Corporation, a Corporation v. McCulloch Motors Corporation, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1963No. 18290_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

McCulloch Motors Corporation, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as McCulloch, plaintiff or appellee) sued below for declaratory relief in connection with United States Letters Patent No. 2,508,784 and No. 2,622,686 (hereinafter referred to as ’784 and ’636, respectively). The sole defendant was Oregon Saw Chain Corporation, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Oregon, defendant, •or appellant), the owner of Cox patents ’636 and ’784.

This declaratory relief action was brought under Sections 1338(a) and 2201 of Title 28 United States Code. Jurisdiction on appeal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
  2. Adkins v. Lear, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Earl R. Ortman, D/B/A Advance Pump & Equipment Co. v. Herbert W. Maass, D/B/A Herb. Maass ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. McCulloch Motors Corp. v. Oregon Saw Chain Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
  5. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API