Legal Opinion

Gollel v. Nassar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: This action was commenced by plaintiffs to recover compensatory and punitive damages arising out of the alleged fraud and misrepresentation of defendants that induced plaintiff Richard Gollel to purchase the stock of plaintiff Canandaigua Development Corporation. After commencement of this *836action, defendants commenced a separate action to foreclose on a mortgage given by plaintiffs in connection with the purchase. In that action, plaintiffs alleged as defenses the causes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oddo v. AGFA-Gevaert, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murray v. SternerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Gollel v. NassarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Gollel v. NassarNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API