Legal Opinion

Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants Richard Gollel and Canandaigua Development Corporation in connection with the purchase of the stock of defendant Canandaigua Development Corporation. Defendants have failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to create a question of fact whether plaintiffs fraudulently induced them to enter into the agreement. Defendants’ conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations of fraud were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barclays Bank v. SokolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gollel v. NassarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API