Legal Opinion

United States v. Bennett

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided August 8, 1964No. Crim. No. AC-856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, Chief Judge.

Defendants, indicted for violation of various criminal penal statutes, claim right to relief under Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, demanding that defendants be furnished a list of witnesses the United States intends to call on trial of the cause. There is no claim defendants do not know the nature and contents of the charges.1 In fact, at the hearing of July 29, 1964 in Columbia, South Carolina, counsel for defendants admitted defendants’ knowledge of the course of conduct or dealing relied upon by the United States in pursuing the matter. Defendants…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Mayor of Baltimore City v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Troutman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  5. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Victor J. Orena, Also Known as Little VicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. AgoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  4. United States v. SandersDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API