State v. B.C.

¶ 1. This is an appeal by the State1 concerning mental health orders involving D.H. and B.C. The state’s attorney contends it was entitled to be heard on its motions for continued treatment at the expiration of mental health orders regarding D.H. and B.C., who had been charged with criminal offenses. The *289criminal division found the state’s attorney had no standing to seek continued treatment at the expiration of a mental health treatment order and denied the State’s motion. We affirm.

¶ 2. D.H. was charged with simple assault on a police officer and resisting arrest.2 After arrest, D.H. was…