Legal Opinion

Powell v. Utz

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided December 29, 1949No. 842PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRIVER, Chief Judge.

Defendants, have moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state a claim against them on which relief can be granted. The basis of this court’s jurisdiction, diversity of citizenship of the parties, is sufficiently stated in the complaint. The allegations which set forth plaintiffs’ claim to relief may be summarized briefly as follows:

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, are Negroes and citizens of the United States. On February 11, 1949 defendants were operating a restaurant which catered to the public, in Pasco, Washington. At about 1:30 P.M. on that day…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Tenino Aerie No. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API