Legal Opinion

Holcombe v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1960No. 38475Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Bell, Judge.

On motion for rehearing, the defendant in error vigorously contends that the holding in this case is not in accord with those in the cases of Travelers Insurance Co. v. Colvard, 70 Ga. App. 257 (28 S. E. 2d 317) and Wiley v. Bituminous Cas. Co., 76 Ga. App. 862 (47 S. E. 2d 652). We do not agree with this argument for the simple reason that a careful reading of these cases shows all three of them to be fully compatible and harmonious.

We adhere to our holding that where there are specific losses as listed in Code Ann. § 114-406, the amounts payable for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Lee v. ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Wiley v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Blackshear v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API