Legal Opinion

In Re Zaepfel & Russell, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 9, 1941No. 13601PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on various petitions to review the order of the Referee entered on March 12th, 1941, which sustained the claims of the New York Casualty Company and the Trinity Universal Insurance Company, and overruled the claims of the First State Bank of LaGrange, Kentucky, the Farmers State Bank of Augusta, Kentucky, and the First Kentucky Fire Insurance Company.

The question of priority between the claims of the surety companies and the claims of the banks depends upon whether we follow the rule adopted by the Federal Courts or the rule announced by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Farmers' Bank v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Avery v. AveryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glenn v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. In Re Van WinkleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
  3. United States v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. In Re Sensor Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re Four Star Construction Co. v. Four Star Construction Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API