Legal Opinion
Herr v. Heiman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1996No. Nos. 94-3411, 94-3421PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Samuel E. Herr brought suit against McCormick Grain — The Heiman Company, Inc. (hereinafter “McCormick”) and James L. Heiman for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., the Kansas Wage Payment Act, K.S.A. 44-313 et seq., and sought cancelation of three promissory notes upon which McCormick later counterclaimed. The district court granted Mr. Herr judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 on his non-wilful Kansas Wage Payment Act claims, the defined benefit portion of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kevin K. Ogden v. San Juan County, Farmington Police Department, Aztec Detention Center, State of New Mexico, and Las Vegas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Russillo v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Salamon v. Our Lady of Victory HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Craig v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- Coonley v. Fortis Benefit InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Herr v. HeimanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.