Legal Opinion
King v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 2006No. 49A02-0504-CR-300PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIRSCH, Chief Judge.
This Court having heretofore handed down its opinion in this appeal on December 30, 2005, marked Memorandum Deci-gion, Not for Publication.
Comes now the Appellant, by counsel, and files herein Motion to Publish, alleging therein that the opinion applies the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), which clarifies the impropriety of a "question-first, Mirandize-later" technique. The Court having examined said Motion, having reviewed its opinion in this case and being duly advised, now finds that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Danielle Kelly v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Morris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Robert E. Hicks v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.