Sargent v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentTongue, J.
As stated by the majority, the principal issue between the parties on this appeal is whether this railroad grade crossing was “extra hazardous,” as previously defined by this court to mean one which is so dangerous that a reasonably prudent motorist cannot safely use it unless the railroad takes measures in excess of those usually taken to warn motorists—in this case by the erection of a wooden “cross-buck” sign.
It is equally well established, however, that whether a particular railroad crossing is extra-hazardous depends upon conditions existing there at the time of the accident and that a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- State Construction Corporation v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.