Legal Opinion

Margiotta v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1993No. 92-0681PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Judge.

The insured appeals a denial of attorney’s fees which he sought after filing suit to collect PIP benefits. We reverse.

The insured was injured on April 24, 1990 and hospitalized for two weeks. He submitted an application for PIP benefits to State Farm, and instructed State Farm that it should apply his PIP benefits to his lost wages, not his medical expenses, which were covered by other insurance. Holloway v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 370 So.2d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (an insured is entitled to have PIP benefits allotted in such a manner as to make the maximum amount…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INS. v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Crotts v. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Holloway v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crooks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Howell-Demarest v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Logue v. Clarendon National InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Marin v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Crooks v. ST. FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API