Legal Opinion

Crooks v. ST. FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1995No. 94-2221Published

1Opinion of the Court

659 So.2d 1266 (1995)

Michael CROOKS, Appellant,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 94-2221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 30, 1995.

Robbins & Reynolds and Robert A. Robbins, Miami, for appellant.

Sparkman, Robb, Nelson & Mason and Richard Nelson, and Frances Fernandez Guasch, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN, and LEVY, JJ.

2Per curiam

An insured appeals a final order denying his claim for attorney's fees in a suit to recover "no-fault" insurance benefits from his insurance company. We reverse because we find that the insurance company failed…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. SE FISHERIES v. Dept. of Nat. ResourcesSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INS. v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. GraffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Dunmore v. Interstate Fire Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API