Legal Opinion

Nepa v. Marta

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 9, 1980PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

This appeal presents this Court with a third opportunity to rule in this case. The plaintiff-appellant, Louise Nepa, Adminis-tratrix of the Estate of Albert H. Nepa (hereinafter “Nepa”), brought this action against the defendant-appellee, Albert H. Marta and his wife, a partnership t/a Chestnut Hill Plaza, for recovery of money allegedly owed because of services performed by her deceased husband in procuring a tenant for a shopping center owned by Marta. In Nepa v. Marta, Del.Supr., 348 A.2d 182 (1975), (Nepa I) this Court determined that, if Nepa was the procuring cause of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. University National Bank v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Bellanca Corporation v. BellancaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Application of Delaware Racing Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  5. Davidson v. RobieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Klair v. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API