Legal Opinion

People v. Fata

New York County Courts

Decided May 5, 1988PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*981OPINION OF THE COURT

William K. Nelson, J.

Pursuant to the request of defendant Caponigro, the issues raised by defendant Fata relative to the eavesdropping warrants will be decided as to both defendants. The defendants have raised the following challenges to the eavesdropping order and warrant signed by the Honorable Robert R. Meehan on October 27, 1987: (1) that the application for the warrant did not set forth probable cause for issuance of that warrant due to the alleged impropriety of the cordless telephone interceptions by Officer Raymond Gerety, the alleged illegality of the search of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. GallinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. ReddickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. FafordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. FafordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API