Legal Opinion

Columbus Mutual Life Ins. Co. of Columbus v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1939No. 28389PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action was brought by the defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, to compel payment of a life insurance policy. The question presented for decision by this appeal is whether a dividend apportioned to the policy should have been applied to the purchase of extended term insurance. It is conceded by the defendant that if this question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

The essential facts are not in dispute. On October 6, 1931, the defendant, in consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodnatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Northwest'n Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Barker's Ex'x.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. SpitlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. GarritsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Mutual Life Assur. Co. Of Worcester, Mass. v. FleischerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API