Legal Opinion
Poneman v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 9, 2016No. 13 CV 8809PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHARLES RONALD NORGLE, Judge, United States District Court
Daniel Poneman (“Plaintiff’) brings suit against Nike, Inc. (“Nike”), and Footlocker, Inc. (“Foot Locker”), (collectively “Defendants”) for trademark infringement related to his “SwagAir” mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121. Plaintiff also asserts common law trademark infringement and claims under the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 Ill. Comp. Stat. 510/1 et seq., and The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 Ill. Comp. Stat. 505/1 et seq. Before the Court is Defendants’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Argyropoulos v. City of AltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Diana Packman v. Chicago Tribune Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Front Page News, Incorporated, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cori v. Phyllis Schlafly's American EaglesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
- Easton v. Primal Wear, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024