Legal Opinion

In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 2, 2000No. 96 CIV. 4584(MP)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, move for an order certifying this case as a class action. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court will certify the proposed class for the periods of June 24 — September 24,1993 and June 24, 1994 — June 15, 1996. This action arises out of the alleged manipulation of prices of copper futures contracts traded on the Commodity Exchange Inc. and the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange Inc. by an alleged conspiracy of certain defendants herein.

Background

On a Rule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duhe v. Texaco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Sumitomo Copper Litigation v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. McIntire v. China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. In re Alstom Sa Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Schrank v. CitibankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API