Legal Opinion

Bland v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1904No. 4605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steele

The information charges that the defendant, on, to wit, May 1st, 1902, at the county of Arapahoe, Colorado, did unlawfully drive, work and use an unregistered docked horse. Section 1 of the statute under which the information is brought, is as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to dock the tail of any horse, within the state of Colorado, or to procure the same to be docked, or to import or bring into this state, any docked horse, or horses, or to drive, work, use, race, or deal in any unregistered docked horse or horses within the state of Colorado.”

Section 2 provides…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Peck v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Eachus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. People v. HinchmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Salt Lake City v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API