Legal Opinion
Gurmankin v. Costanzo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 25, 1977No. Nos. 76-1730, 76-2297 and 77-1273PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
In these appeals we review two injunctive orders entered by the district court in an action charging that the defendants, officials of the Philadelphia School District, discriminated against the plaintiff, Judith Gurmankin, because she is a blind person.1 Ms. Gurmankin is an English teacher. She holds a Professional Certificate from the Pennsylvania Department of Education as a teacher of Comprehensive English in Pennsylvania Public Schools. In 1969 she attempted to obtain employment in the Philadelphia School District. At that time the District’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Mildred Lee Rogers v. Frito-Lay, Incorporated, Howard L. Moon v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Novella H. Trageser v. Libbie Rehabilitation Center, Inc., T/a Libbie Convalescent HomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Malmed v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- 19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 418, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9188 Raymond E. Trafelet v. James R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.