Legal Opinion

Ex parte Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 2000No. 10-99-109-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*647OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

For the third time, David Thomas appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for an expunction. See Ex parte Thomas, 956 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.App.—Waco 1997, no pet.) (Thomas IT); Thomas v. State, 916 S.W.2d 540 (Tex.App.—Waco 1995, no writ) (Thomas I). We reversed the order denying his petition in Thomas I because the trial court excluded evidence offered by Thomas to show that the indictment against him was based on false information or mistake. We reversed the order in Thomas II because we found the evidence “factually insufficient” to sustain the trial court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ames v. AmesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ex Parte Current, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  5. Heckathorne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of El Paso v. VielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Ford Ex Rel. Williams v. City of Lubbock, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  3. Barker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. West Travis County Public Utility Agency, on Behalf of Itself and Its Directors, Larry Fox, Michael Murphy, Ray Whisenant, Bill Goodwin, and Scott Roberts, in Their Official Capacities v. CCNG Development Co., L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Ex Parte: D.H.I., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API