Ex Parte Current
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
Carl Current, Jr., proceeding in forma pauperis, moved to expunge the records of his conviction for burglary of a building. See TexUode Crim.PROCAnn. art. 55.01 (Vernon Supp.1994). Although Current claims that the court erred in dismissing his motion, the record reflects that the court actually denied the motion. He argues that the court abused its discretion by ruling on the motion without holding an evidentiary hearing and that the State failed to carry a burden of demonstrating that he was not entitled to an expunetion. We will reverse.
The facts are not in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Munoz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Harris County District Attorney's Office v. J.T.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Heine v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Ex Parte Guajardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- In Re the Expunction of Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- Ex Parte Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Perdue v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.