Legal Opinion

Skjervem v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 18, 2009No. A-9972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Kristian Skjervem appeals his conviction for fourth-degree controlled substance misconduct (possession of cocaine).1 The issue on appeal is whether the evidence against Skjervem was the fruit of an unlawful search or seizure. For the reasons explained here, we conclude that we can not resolve this issue without further findings of fact. We *1103therefore remand this case to the superior court.

Overview of the facts undertying this case

Although the facts pertaining to the legality of the searches in this case must be described in some detail, the basic events underlying this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stepovich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  4. Phillip Alexander Duty v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  5. Skjervem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API