Legal Opinion

Krimsky v. Lombardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered July 18, 1974 in Albany County, which dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs were the executors of the estate of Philip Krimsky *601and defendants were engaged by them as legal counsel to the estate. Following the decree by which the account of that estate was finally settled, plaintiffs instituted the present action against them on a theory of malpractice. We agree with Special Term’s dismissal of their complaint for the reason that plaintiffs were aware of the matters alleged therein…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re DenboskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Krimsky v. LombardiNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davies v. StumpfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Davies v. StumpfNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Wisdom v. NealDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
  3. DiMauro v. PaviaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
  4. In re the Estate of RemsenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
  5. In re the Estate of ZaharisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API