Legal Opinion
Krimsky v. Lombardi
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtA. Franklin Mahoney, J.
The defendants, individually and as constituting the law firm of Lombardi and Reinhard, move for an order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint on the several grounds that plaintiffs (a) as executors, lack the capacity to sue, (b) as individuals, cannot and do not istate a cause of action. In the alternative, defendants move for relief requiring plaintiffs to replead (CPLR 3014, 3024).
Plaintiffs, as executors of the estate of Philip Krimsky, retained defendants as counsel for the estate. Objections to the executors’ accounts were filed by certain beneficiaries of the estate and a hearing and trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Accounting of OrdwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- In re the Construction of the Will of JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of BeachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
- In re the Estate of PayneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Estate of HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Levisohn, Lerner, Berger & Langsam v. Medical Taping Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Wisdom v. NealDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
- DiMauro v. PaviaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- Krimsky v. LombardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.