Legal Opinion

Holder v. Haskett

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 26, 1984No. 0285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action for damages for alleged breach of an implied warranty of habitability arising from the sale of residential real estate. Norman and Linda Holder appeal from the granting of nonsuits in favor of the defendants F. Ray Haskett, Jr., and Huntington Developers and the granting of a directed verdict in favor of the defendant Haskett Realty, Inc. We affirm.

In Lane v. Trenholm Building Company, 267 S. C. 497, 229 S. E. (2d) 728 (1976), our Supreme Court held that when a new house is sold, the vendor impliedly warrants the house is free from latent defects which would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane v. Trenholm Building CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Roundtree Villas Assoc., Inc. v. KINGS CORP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Jackson v. River Pines, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Skinner & Ruddock, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGann v. MungoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. CARO. WINDS OWNERS'ASSOC., INC. v. Joe Harden Bldrs., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Trancik v. USAA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API