Legal Opinion

Jackson v. River Pines, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 3, 1981No. 21386PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Robert W. and Lillie P. Jackson appeal the order of the trial court sustaining respondents’ demurrer to the Jack-sons’ cause of action for breach of an alleged implied warranty of fitness of land for residential purposes. The trial court ruled that no cause was stated since no such implied warranty attaches in South Carolina. We agree and affirm.

The warranty was said to arise solely by virtue of restrictive covenants placed on a tract of which appellants’ lot is a part, restricting use of the land to residential home development. Appellants allege breach of warranty because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Lane v. Trenholm Building CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Pilkington v. McBRAINSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Preston H. Haskell Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Whale Branch Corp. v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Conklin v. HurleySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Rusch v. Lincoln-Devore Testing Laboratory, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Rosauer Corporation v. Sapp Development, L.L.C. Todd Sapp Whispering Creek, L.L.C. And W.C. Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API