Legal Opinion

Roughton v. Knight

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1911No. 711PublishedCited by 19 opinions

IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve rights of a patentee under the forest law acts of Jun^ 4, 1897, and March 3, 1905, are stated in the opinion. Title passed to the United States upon the recording of the deed of relinquishment.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve rights of a patentee under the forest law acts of Jun^ 4, 1897, and March 3, 1905, are stated in the opinion. Title passed to the United States upon the recording of the deed of relinquishment. Moses Land Co., 34 L. D. 458, holding that title did not pass to the United States by the recording of the deed and delivery of the same to the local land officers, does pot reach, the gist of the question. While the mere recording of a deed does not operate as a delivery and pass title, where the vendee assents in…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton

The question in. this case is whether the complainant below, and appellant here, has acquired, a vested right to an exchange of a one hundred and sixty-acre tract of land owned by him and situated inside the exterior boundary of a forest-reserve, for a tract o{ public land of similar area, by reason of acts done in compliance yvith the terms of that, provision of the Forest Reserve Act of June 4,1897, providing for such exchanges. .The Supreme Court of California sustained a demurrer and dismissed his bill. 103 Pac. Rep. 844. A writ of error to that court brings the case here for review as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Roughton v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., VSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Durham Provision Co. v. DavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Peale v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API