Legal Opinion

James L. Hamlin v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 15, 1968No. 251-67Published

1Opinion of the Court

391 F.2d 941

James L. HAMLIN

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 251-67.

United States Court of Claims.

March 15, 1968.

David Machanic, Washington, D. C., attorney of record, for plaintiff. Pierson, Ball & Dowd, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Charles M. Munnecke, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., for defendant.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS, COLLINS, SKELTON and NICHOLS, Judges.

ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DURFEE, Judge.

1

Plaintiff, a lieutenant in the Army, was convicted of bribery in a Federal District Court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API