Legal Opinion

Harrison v. ITT Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered on or about October 14, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While a trademark licensor not formally involved as a manufacturer, designer or seller may be subject to liability for injuries caused by a defective product where, for example, it has had significant involvement in distribution or is capable of exercising control over quality (see, Burkert v Petrol Plus, 216 Conn 65, 77-82, 579 A2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Porter v. LSB Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Firestone Steel Products Co. v. BarajasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Asbestos Settlement Trust v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Bay Summit Community Assn. v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Lou v. Otis Elevator CompanyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Laurin Maritime AB v. Imperial Chemical Industries PLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API