Legal Opinion
Whitaker v. Paden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 3, 1948No. 32224PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The question presented here is controlled by the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. If the defendant was to account to' the plaintiff and pay him for the chemicals which he was holding in his place of business as the property of the plaintiff, as the same were'sold by him, then he was the bailee of the property which he held on consignment. See Furst Bros. v. Commercial Bank of Augusta, 117 Ga. 472(1) (43 S. E. 728); McKenzie v. Roper Wholesale Groc. Co., 9 Ga. App. 185 (70 S. E. 981); Johnston- Crews Co. v. Smith, 161 Ga. 382 (131 S. E.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Furst Bros. v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Watkins v. PaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Cohen v. ArensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Bennett v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Cotton v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Johnson v. CurentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Curry v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.