Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2000Published

1ConcurrenceMugglin, J.

While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the judgment of conviction must be reversed, my rationale differs from that of the majority. First, in my view, the majority’s reliance on Taylor v Illinois (484 US 400), United States v Nobles (422 US 225), People v Bembry (258 *611AD2d 921, lv denied 93 NY2d 897) and People v Byrd (239 AD2d 277, lv denied 90 NY2d 902) is misplaced. Those cases involve the exercise of a court’s discretion to preclude a prospective defense witness when the defendant has failed to take the proper initiative to comply with a discovery order or a statutory mandate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. People v. GilmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API