Brown v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of embezzlement, the charge being based on Section 5146, Rev. Gen. Stat. 1920.
The property involved is described in the information as “the sum of $5,000, lawful currency of the United States.” The proof shows the property to have been a cheek in amount of $5,000, and not currency. In view, however, of the provisions of Sec. 6068, Rev. Gen. Stat. 1920, this circumstance does not constitute a variance between allegation and proof. Thalheim v. State, 38 Fla. 169, 20 South Rep. 938.
The prosecution arose out of the following…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thalheim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- The People v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Peck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- The People v. StevensIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Fouts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Corlise v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.