Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 11802PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The petitioner applies for a peremptory writ of mandate to be directed to the Superior Court, in and for the County of Los Angeles, and the judge thereof, commanding said court to entertain, hear and determine the application of petitioner for probation, under the provisions of section 1203 of the Penal Code. The facts underlying petitioner’s application, and which are undenied, may be briefly stated as follows: The petitioner, after his indictment by a grand jury for the offense of involuntary manslaughter, was brought to trial thereon, and on or about April 25, 1928, was found by the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. People Ex Rel. Woodin v. OttawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Bottomly v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Beggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API