Mass Transit Administration v. Household Finance Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent · ColeCole, J.
We shall hold in this appeal that the appellant, Mass Transit Administration (MTA), is not subject to the levy of attachments on the wages of its employees.
Appellee, Household Finance Corporation (HFC), obtained separate judgments in the Superior Court of Baltimore City against two different employees of MTA. HFC directed the clerk of the court to issue writs of attachment on the judgments and instructed the sheriff to lay the same in the hands of the Administrator of the MTA. In Superior Court case No. 26087 the attachment was directed to the wages of HFC’s judgment debtor and MTA’s…
Also in this document: Dissent · Cole.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Austin v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Root ex rel. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Weide v. Mass Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. KranzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Lomax v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Mayor of Baltimore v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.