Legal Opinion

United States v. Jamil

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 1, 1982No. 81 CR 687(S)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEINSTEIN, Chief Judge:

Defendant is charged with the violation of statutes prohibiting the sale of electronic eavesdropping devices in this country and the export without a license of equipment with potential military use. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2512(l)(a), (b), (c); 22 U.S.C. §§ 2778(b)(2), (c). He moves to dismiss on the ground that the government violated his Sixth Amendment rights by recording a conversation among himself, his trial attorney and an informer. The latter had been equipped by government investigators with a Nagra recorder after the United States Attorney and the…

2Cases cited66 opinions

Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

United States v. JamilDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982