Legal Opinion

Graham v. Corporon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1966No. 44,425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The plaintiff-appellant, A. Staneart Graham, commenced this action pursuant to K. S. A. 60-907, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other taxpayers of the city of Pittsburg, Kansas, to enjoin the commissioners of the city from proceeding with certain street improvements without submitting the question to a popular vote, pursuant to K. S. A. 12-688.

It is unnecessary to summarize the plaintiff’s petition or the city commissioners’ answer since the facts disclosed in those pleadings are not in dispute. The city commission moved to dismiss…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. State ex rel. Blake v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Griffith v. City of WalnutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seltmann v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Hallmark Cards, Inc. v. Kansas Department of Commerce & HousingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Student Loan Marketing Ass'n ex rel. Servicing Agent, Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API